There are many texts on the theory of Credit Valuation Adjustment (CVA) but CVA is about much more than theory. The motivation for setting up an infrastructure to manage CVA varies considerably across institutions. The implementation of a CVA function can be highly political as it cuts across product lines and blurs the boundaries between risk management and the front office. There are also considerable systems, methodological and trading challenges. In this paper we examine some of the different motivations that have lead institutions to set up a CVA function and the practical issues they have faced.
What Comes Next for Collateral Management- Market Insights [PDF]
The SunGard/Finadium 2010 Survey on Collateral Management has identified collateral optimization and efficient collateral management as being the next big challenge for the collateral management industry. Whether facing new Basel III recommendations or looking to make processes more effective, 122 participants in the collateral management industry have clearly indicated that capital charges and optimizing the use of assets are their primary concerns. They also expect the next important advances in collateral management to occur in these areas. Technology will be a primary driver for meeting new collateral optimization mandates and solving both siloed and cross divisional challenges.
Fit for purpose? Reassessing the role of risk management - Market Insights [PDF]
As the industry reassesses the role of risk management, and keeps up with new regulatory demands, legacy systems are becoming a constraint to progress. Josie Palazzolo outlines what capabilities a modern-day risk application must possess and how advancements in technology can make these applications a reality.
A New Approach to Collateral Management - Market Insights [PDF]
Collateralisation has been a fixture in capital markets for many years and has served as a useful means for firms to both increase trading capacity whilst simultaneously mitigating counterparty credit risk. The question arises: do the techniques which worked well several years ago still work today?
Credit Charging in the Trading Book - The End of Credit Risk Management as we know it? - Market Insights [PDF]
It is becoming increasingly common for banks to charge their front office trading units for the expected losses and the capital cost of credit risk generated by their derivative trades. This charge is an internal estimate of the cost of counterparty credit risk incurred in the course of trading activities and serves as a method of encouraging the front office to manage credit exposure prudently and charge for it properly. At the same time, the credit risk so created is itself monitored, managed and hedged in the derivative markets by a desk established specifically for this function.
Wrong WayRisk II - Market insights [PDF]
Dan Travers and Jean-Marc Schwob, product managers for SunGard's enterprise risk solution Adaptiv demonstrate how credit exposure profiles could be adjusted to reflect elements of wrongway risk.In our first whitepaper we outlined a pragmatic approach to the detection of wrong-way risk situations, combining a numerical analysis of portfolio sensitivities with a judgement-based assessment of counterparties' business risk sensitivities. In this second paper we extend this argument to demonstrate how credit exposure profiles could be adjusted to reflect elements of wrong-way risk. Furthermore, we examine whether exposures should be adjusted in Basel II Pillar 1 capital calculations.
Wrong way risk is defined by the International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) as the risk that occurs when "exposure to a counterparty is adversely correlated with the credit quality of that counterparty". In short it is where default risk and exposure come together. The terms 'wrong way risk' and 'wrong way exposure' are often used interchangeably.
Ordinarily in trading book credit risk measurement, the creditworthiness of the counterparty and the exposure of a transaction are measured and modelled independently. However in a transaction where wrong way risk may occur, this approach is simply not sufficient and ignores a significant source of potential loss.
The Risk Overhaul: A new framework for risk management - Market Insights [PDF]
As the market awaits new global regulations and debates the mathematical basis for a new modeling regime, Marcus Cree argues that now is the right time to re-consider the purpose of, and the constituencies served by, risk management. Rather than starting with a new solution, maybe the real starting point is 'What is the question?'
Catastrophic Risk: Part I - Market Insights [PDF]
Anticipating and mitigating catastrophic risk: We have recently experienced an unprecedented time in the global financial markets. Not surprisingly, risk managers and the techniques they employ are under fire from market participants, regulators, financial reporters, and shareholders alike.
Default Risk: Part II - Market Insights [PDF]
Over the last week, seismic events have fundamentally altered the capital markets landscape. Weary eyed risk professionals have spent 15 hour days answering a multitude of management concerns:
Strategic Risk: Part III - Market Insights [PDF]
Strategic risk taking: Financial institutions looking to revise their risk management processes must consider a more integrated approach that gives traders and risk managers organizational parity.